<p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Application no. 102024:</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">1. Failure to comply with undertaking</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">2. Failure to comply with condition on practising certificate</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">3. Failure to respond to the Society’s correspondence</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Application no. 102025:</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">1. Failure to pay the complainant’s [Counsel’s] fees</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">2. Without reasonable excuse, failed to comply with a requirement under Section 660 of the Legal Profession Act, 2004</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">3. Failed to assist the Law Society with the investigation of a complaint</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">4. Failure to respond to complainant’s communications</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Amended Applications in 102024 &amp; 102025:</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">1. The Solicitor has failed to comply with an Order of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">2. The Solicitor attempted to mislead the Administrative Decisions Tribunal</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Application no. 112033:</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">1. Breach of Rules 32 &amp; 33 of the Professional Conduct &amp; Practice Rules</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">2. Breach of Sections 254 &amp; 260 of the Legal Profession Act, 2004</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">3. Failure to respond to complainant’s [Counsel’s] correspondence</span></p>

[<a href="http://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/action/PJUDG?jgmtid=159848&quot;&gt;Council of the Law Society of NSW v Mee Ling [2012] NSWADT 146</a>]